Monday, December 20, 2010

Mr. Virgil of Mantua

It surprised me to find in the Aeneid lots of references to Italian mythology, history , folklore that I would hear my grandmother make. Not that she would get into long speeches, but just occasionally make a reference in conversation to the Caesars or some historical event or mythological personage, or custom or something that was typically Italian. It tells you how ingrained the history and national mythology is in everyone. Those people know who they are. As the writer Severigni said in La Bella Figura: "Italians are psychologically self-sufficient."

I knew, because I read some background, that Virgil (I was surprised to find that he was from northern Italy, again like my family, not very close to Rome, as I would've thought) was writing at the time of the Caesars and his aim was to give a history of Italy up to that point, and in some ways to justify the exploits of the Roman Empire, etc., and to sort of establish a national identity by solidly describing the founding of Rome. He does this by using prophesies to foretell the "future" - where the characters are told of the exploits of their descendants, etc. One chapter includes all these stories engraved in pictures on the shield of Aeneas, which Vulcan supposedly makes for him. This is directly parallel to the "The Shield of Achilles" chapter in the Iliad, where Hephaestus makes a magical shield for Achilles, with moving pictures, kind of like a film. I don't think it foretells any history in the Iliad, it's just a magical, powerful shield. (But that is the most beautiful, and my favorite, chapter in the Iliad!)

Right after I finished The Aeneid, I got into reading some Shakespeare (because I wanted to see The Tempest!), and I was pleasantly surprised to find that I got most of the references to classical mythology - didn't have to read the footnotes!

Between Homer and Virgil, I am now kind of tired of battle scenes. And they do get gory. So, let's see what The Divine Comedy holds!

Friday, December 17, 2010

Narnia on film again - oh, no!

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. The latest Narnia movie. I am speechless. Do these screenwriters really think they are better storytellers than C.S.Lewis? Really? They can't even write single lines better than C.S.Lewis!

I mean - let's get things out of chronological order, skip the really important stuff, change up some locations, create some lame characters that NEVER appear in the book and are barely touched upon in the movie except to confuse people, and drop all attempts at humor and charm! I mean - if you can't portray the Dufflepuds as funny then you are totally hopeless! It's all there in the book - just stick it on the screen! And what's with the green mist!?/!!! GREEN MIST?!! And the MINOTAUR?! There was no minotaur on that ship! There was barely ever a minotaur in Narnia at all! Maybe one! As if there aren't enough exotic creatures?! Furthermore, they totally blew off the political intrigue/maneuverings in the Lone Islands scene and supplanted them with just another ol' stupid sword-fighting thing, they got the end all wrong, and please - explain the 7 swords?! Somebody - please?! What 7 swords? "Gotta find the 7 swords!" This ain't Lord of the goddam Rings, ok? If they're so important, can you maybe devote a little more time to them? Maybe some background?! Oh, I'm sorry! THERE IS NO BACKGROUND - IT DOESN'T EXIST! And the sea monster was dealt with in the most charming, funny way in the book - not some CGI bloodbath like they had here! This must be some lame, far too serious and self-conscious attempt to deal with a story that is about a Voyage, a Journey, an Odyssey, characters, people, creatures - with no major, gory battles in it! (I guess a few skirmishes are not enough!) So let's make some up! Who cares if we destroy the story in the process! Sell some box office! Awful! I'm going to go read the book again. Maybe go see The Tempest again. Now, that's a movie.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Aeneid - almost done

The main thing about Camilla the Amazon, and one would suppose, all Amazons, is that Diana is mourning her. Yes - she was a fierce warrior, dedicated completely to the worship of Diana, remaining therefore, a maiden, supposedly untouched by men - no mention is made of women - but what a terror she was on the battlefield is of secondary importance. Diana loved her and mourned her. That is really where her power lay. That is what the identity of an Amazon was. Not everyone is so phenomenal as to be mourned by a great goddess: Diana, Goddess of the Moon, the Hunt, the Wood and its Creatures, and the Crossroads.